Polish README into a proper FOSS project page #140
Labels
No labels
bug
devops
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
layout
next major release
next minor release
question
research
testing
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: lvl0/fedi-feed-router#140
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
The README currently reads as personal-project notes. Bring it up to the
standard a visitor expects from a public FOSS repo.
Scope was widened beyond the README itself to a full repo-presentation pass —
a visitor judges the repo root, not just one file.
README
Supporting files
LICENSE— AGPL-3.0, copyright holder lvl0. No LICENSE file currentlyexists even though the README already links to one.
CHANGELOG.md— from v1.4.0 onward only, not backfilled.CONTRIBUTING.md— as its own file (supersedes the earlier"out of scope" note below).
Repo cleanup
Verified dead, zero references outside their own definitions:
Jenkinsfile— invokes arun-regression-tests.shthat does not exist,and competes with
.forgejo/workflows/ci.ymlapp/Http/Middleware/HandleInertiaRequests.php— not registered inbootstrap/app.phpinertiajs/inertia-laravel,tightenco/ziggy,laravel/breeze— no references in app/config/routes/resources/bootstrap,no tracked
.jsx/.tsx, no React entrypoint invite.config.jscomposer.json metadata
Still stock starter-kit values: name
laravel/react-starter-kit, description"The skeleton application for the Laravel framework", and
license: MIT,which contradicts the README's AGPL-3.0 claim. Fix all of it.
AI assistance note
Add a small, matter-of-fact remark (one or two lines, near the bottom) that
this project was developed with AI assistance. No disclaimer tone, no banner.
Out of scope